<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumours; Canon 50D and 60D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ermany.net/rumours-canon-50d-and-60d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ermany.net/rumours-canon-50d-and-60d/</link>
	<description>Personal web page of Erman the photographer. Main contents of this page are; Photography and Design</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.ermany.net/rumours-canon-50d-and-60d/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ermany.net/?p=217#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Having recently upgraded from the 400D to the 40D, I will see no need to upgrade to a 50D for the sake of a couple of extra megapixels and maybe a couple more AF points.  The 40D is a marvellous camera, solid, rugged, and 6.5 fps.  In a word - Awesome.

Now the 60D, thats another story...At least I'll have time to save up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having recently upgraded from the 400D to the 40D, I will see no need to upgrade to a 50D for the sake of a couple of extra megapixels and maybe a couple more AF points.  The 40D is a marvellous camera, solid, rugged, and 6.5 fps.  In a word - Awesome.</p>
<p>Now the 60D, thats another story&#8230;At least I&#8217;ll have time to save up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
